While the infrastructures for open education, such as the wide range offered by the twillo portal, have been further differentiated for years, the re-use of open teaching materials in the higher education sector seems to remain at a consistently low level. It is unclear how a broader re-use of open teaching and learning materials (Open Educational Resources, OER) can be achieved. One factor that has received too little attention to date is the indexing of OER. The unpopular task of a differentiated description of OER with metadata is of central importance when it comes to the sustainable provision and reuse of OER. This is the conclusion of a study on didactic metadata in OER and teaching portals, which was carried out in the context of twillo and provides an overview of the current practice of tagging OER.
High-quality offerings of open university teaching depend on numerous factors, not only in the context of the twillo portal. Open teaching and learning offerings require suitable prerequisites on an infrastructural, technical, organizational and didactic level, but these are at best a sine qua non for the success of open university teaching. In order for open education to become sustainable and for OER to be reused in a variety of ways, further framework conditions must also be guaranteed in the sense of a conditio per quam. In order to improve the conditions for open teaching, it is particularly important to make it as easy as possible for teachers to find open teaching and learning materials that they can use for their own courses.
Teachers can only check internet documents, videos, images and other learning objects provided on OER portals such as twillo for reusability with a manageable amount of effort if the materials are more than just superficially indexed. Teaching and learning materials that do not contain any accompanying information on the context of origin, access and license rights, didactics or technology are not very transparent for potential reusers and require reusers to carry out a time-consuming case-by-case examination. In order to keep the necessary effort for potential reusers to a minimum, meaningful metadata is required. Didactic metadata is particularly important for subsequent use in specific courses.
The HIS Institute for Higher Education Development (HIS-HE), the Virtual Campus Rhineland-Palatinate (VCRP), the office of the state portal ORCA.nrw and the foundation itself investigated the questions as part of a cooperation funded by the Foundation for Innovation in Higher Education,
- which approaches currently exist for mapping the didactic dimensions of OER in metadata standards,
- in what form didactic scenarios can be described in university teaching and
- which didactic (minimum) specifications are necessary and helpful to ensure greater re-use of OER.
Based on differentiated desk research and a qualitative survey of eleven experts in the context of guided interviews, the recently published reportThe report Didactic Metadata in OER and Teaching Portals, which has just been published, is based on differentiated desk research and a qualitative survey of eleven experts in the context of guided interviews. It examines the mapping of didactic dimensions in selected metadata standards such as “Learning Objects Metadata” (LOM) and “General Metadata Profile for Educational Resources” (AMB), highlights future possibilities for automated indexing of OER and makes recommendations on how the description of teaching materials using metadata can significantly reduce the transfer costs of potential reusers:and how didactic metadata can contribute to valuable didactic self-reflection in university teaching.
Download: Wannemacher, K.; Stein, M.; Kaemena, A.: Didactic metadata in OER and teaching portals. From the premise of pedagogical neutrality to the strengthening of open teaching practice . Hanover: HIS-HE 2024 (Forum Hochschulentwicklung 1|2024).