Below are a few examples of how to cite individual types of works that are relevant to teaching practice. Our blog post “Citing correctly in teaching: An understandable explanation of citation rights” also contains general explanations of citation rights.
Screencasts and Screenshots
Legally, a screenshot or screencast is a reproduction of third-party content (website, software interface, video, social media post, etc.). A permissible quotation only exists if
- the recorded program interface/other media content itself is the subject of the explanation (e.g., if the content is analyzed, functionalities are discussed in detail, menus or operating logic are compared or discussed in detail, etc.),
- the screenshot/screencast directly aids understanding of one’s own explanations (internal connection),
- only as much is shown as necessary, i.e., only excerpts relevant to the discussion,
- the program and creators of the content are fully credited (source reference in the video/material).
Not permitted as a quotation: Screencasts that show copyrighted films, series, newspaper articles, games, programs, or entire websites solely to “demonstrate what it looks like” without discussing the content.
musical quotations
Music can also be quoted – Section 51 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) does not distinguish between different types of works; the context is what matters.
Music in musical works
In musical works, i.e., compositions, arrangements, or remixes, the use of musical quotations is subject to particularly strict regulations because even short sequences of notes can make a work clearly recognizable. Section 51(3) of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) therefore expressly permits only the quotation of “individual passages from a published musical work” in another musical work—and even then only under strict conditions. Only short, clearly defined excerpts, typically short motifs or distinctive passages, are permitted to be embedded in a new musical work.
As with a “normal” quotation, there must be a purpose for the quotation: the motif must be used in a meaningful way in terms of content, for example as an allusion, homage, parodic device, or deliberate stylistic quotation. The quoted excerpt must remain recognizable as a foreign element and must not carry or dominate the new work. For example, it would be permissible to quote the opening motif of Beethoven’s 5th Symphony as a homage to an otherwise independent composition.
Music in teaching and learning materials
Educational resources such as scripts, lecture slides, audio commentaries, or video lectures are generally protected by copyright as literary works or hybrid forms combining text, images, and sound. The general requirements for quotations set out in Section 51 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) therefore apply to any music included in such resources.
The following are permitted in particular:
- a short recording of a piece of music to explain or analyze style, harmony, lyrics, structure, or production methods in a targeted manner;
- The use of audio examples that are commented on in direct relation to the topic at hand, for example, during a detailed discussion of a pop song in a music or media seminar.
The following, in particular, are not covered by the right to quote:
- Compositions as mere background music in educational videos, without any independent examination of content
- the complete reproduction of a song without a comprehensible purpose of quotation;
For OER, this means:
- Short musical quotations with a recognizable purpose can be part of open teaching materials as long as they are recognizable as quotations.
- OER should not be designed in such a way that a song or substantial parts thereof are effectively available as freely accessible audio content, thereby replacing regular forms of use (streaming, purchase, licensing); in such cases, the limits of fair use would be exceeded.
Texts
When quoting text, care must be taken to ensure that the scope and weight of the external text does not become excessive: your own work must clearly be in the foreground in terms of both content and scope, and the quotation may only have a supporting function. The external work may therefore not form the core of your own presentation or replace your own thoughts, but may only serve as evidence for your own argumentation.
The permissible scope depends on the purpose of the quotation and must be determined on a case-by-case basis; as a guideline, text quotations should generally only comprise an excerpt and, as a rule, only a fraction of the third-party work. Entire linguistic works (e.g., a complete article or a complete poem) may only be quoted in full in exceptional cases if the content must be discussed in relation to the complete text and a shorter passage would not serve the purpose of analysis or discussion (typical, for example, in the case of short poems).
Typically required are:
- Author: First and last name
- Title of work (article or book title)
- In anthologies: if applicable, title of the journal/series or anthology
- Year of publication
- Page number(s) of the cited passage
- For online texts, also include: URL and, if possible, (last) date accessed.
Example:
Müller, Anna (2026): “Title of the essay,” in: Journal X, 12, pp. 45–47.
Pictures and illustrations
Illustrations—such as graphics, photos, or diagrams from specialist journals and textbooks—may also be quoted under the conditions set out in Section 51 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG). Publishers may not “prevent” such lawful quotations; the right to quote is a mandatory copyright restriction and cannot be effectively excluded by general terms and conditions or license provisions.
An image citation is permissible if the image in question is itself the subject of the discussion, for example:
- the analysis of a diagram or statistics,
- the interpretation of a cartoon or illustration,
- the art-historical discussion of a painting, photograph, or poster.
In these cases, the image serves as a necessary point of reference for analysis, criticism, comparison, or interpretation; without the image citation, the argument itself would be difficult or impossible to understand.
However, the purely decorative use of images is not covered by the right to quote, for example:
- any photo on the title slide just because it “looks nicer,”
- an illustration to lighten the mood, without going into detail
- An image that is only used as a background graphic, for example.
In such cases, the image is interchangeable—it could be replaced by any other comparable illustration without changing the content or message of the text. In this case, the necessary internal connection between the work and the quotation is missing; this is normal use, not a quotation.
Images may be quoted in part or in full, provided that the scope is justified by the purpose of the quotation:
- If an excerpt (e.g., a detail from a map or diagram) is sufficient, only that part should be used.
- If the image can only be meaningfully analyzed as a whole (e.g., a caricature or a work of art whose message is derived from the overall composition), a full quotation may be permissible.
For image citations, the source reference should include:
- Author: First and last name
- Title of the image (or a description if no title exists)
- Year of origin (if known)
- Reference:
- For reproductions in books: additionally, book title, publisher, year of publication, page number.
- For museum works: museum/collection and location.
- For online images: URL and date accessed.
Example:
Image: van Gogh, Vincent: Starry Night, 1889, Museum of Modern Art, New York.
Photo: Max Example, “Title of photo,” in: Meier, Sabine: Landscapes, Berlin: Example Publishing, 2023, p. 12.
Movies and videos
The same basic principles apply to film and video quotations as to text or image quotations, but they are handled particularly restrictively due to the typical length and appeal of audiovisual works.
The use of film excerpts is permitted if they are specifically analyzed or commented on in terms of content and subject matter, for example in the context of film analysis or media criticism. The excerpt must be necessary for the respective discussion and must be embedded in a separate work; it may not serve merely as illustration or “light relief.”
However, integrating entire films or longer videos into OER or publicly accessible teaching materials is not considered quotation, but rather regular use of the work—this requires usage rights or licenses. The limitation of quotation rights does not legitimize complete reproduction in this case, as the OER material would otherwise effectively become a free substitute source for the film.
In exceptional cases, short films or videos may be quoted in full if the requirements for extensive scientific quotations under Section 51, sentence 2, no. 1 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) are met. This requires that:
- an independent scientific work (e.g., essay, dissertation, research report, lecture),
- eine vertiefte inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung gerade mit diesem konkreten Film/Video,
- the need to reproduce the work in its entirety because the purpose of the analysis or discussion can only be meaningfully achieved on the basis of the entire short film (e.g., in the case of very short videos or commercials),
- a clear dominance of one’s own explanations over mere reproduction, as well as
- A complete citation (director, title, year, production company, source/URL, time details).
For film and video quotations, the following is recommended as a minimum:
- Name of the director (and producer, if applicable)
- Title of the film/video
- year of production
- Production location and production company (or platform)
- Exact time stamp of the quoted sequence (e.g., 00:01:10–00:01:25)
- For online videos, also include: URL and date accessed.
Example:
Zemeckis, Robert (director): Forrest Gump [film], USA: Paramount Pictures, 1994, 01:02:14–01:02:45.
AI-generated content
It is important to distinguish here: The right to quote is a limitation of copyright law and requires that the quoted material is protected by copyright as a work or part of a work.
According to current opinion, purely machine-generated AI content is generally not considered to be the “personal intellectual creation” of a human being and is therefore often not protected by copyright (de facto in the public domain). Such public domain content may be used, modified, and reproduced to any extent without the right to quote; legally, this is not a “quotation” but free use.
Nevertheless, the right to quote can play a role in AI material:
- Human-influenced AI output: If AI is only used as a tool and the result is edited to such an extent that it becomes a “personal intellectual creation,” the result may again be protected as a work.
- AI output contains parts of third-party works: AI output that recognizably incorporates passages, images, or music from protected works (e.g., almost original song lyrics, striking book passages, typical images) is problematic.
These parts remain protected by copyright; anyone who uses them either needs permission or can rely on the right to quote in the case of analysis, criticism, etc.
The clear labeling of AI output is strongly recommended in practice. Practical tip: In our FAQ, we explain how AI-generated content can be marked as such in the metadata.
Further information is available in our Help Center. In addition, the twillo team is available by email or every Thursday during twillo Thursday to answer any questions you may have about copyright, AI, and OER.